Laparoscopic assisted adenomyomectomy using double flap method

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative prognosis and progression in patients who received laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy using the double flap method. METHODS: The pelvic cavity was explored by the conventional laparoscopic method, and drainage was achieved through a 5-mm trocar. After a small incision in the abdomen, the uterus was incised from the fundus to the upper cervical margin until exposing the endometrial cavity. Adenomyotic tissue was removed using a scalpel, scissors, or monopolar electrical bovie. The endometrial cavity was repaired with interrupted sutures using 2-0 vicryl. One side of the serosal flap was used to cover the endometrial side of the uterus. The second serosal flap covered the first flap after removal of the serosal surface of the first flap. RESULTS: From January 2008 to March 2012, there were 11 cases of laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy at Chungnam National University Hospital. Nine cases were analyzed, excluding two cases with less than one year of follow-up. The average patient age was 37.0 years and average follow-up duration was 32.8 months. All patients showed improvement in dysmenorrhea (P < 0.001) and hypermenorrhea (P = 0.001) after surgery and were evaluated by visual analogue scale score. However, symptoms of adenomyosis were aggravated in three patients. Adenomyosis was progressed in the side opposite the site of operation. One patient required a total laparoscopic hysterectomy 27 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy using the double flap method is effective for uterine reduction and relief of dysmenorrhea and hypermenorrhea. Conservative management and careful follow-up are needed because adenomyosis can recur or progress in some patients.

Two-port access versus four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between two-port access and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty nine patients who had received two-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=175) and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=314) in Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between the bilaterality of the cysts and cyst diameter of less than 6 cm and 6 cm or more. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient's age, parity, body weight, body mass index and history of previous surgery between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group. Bilaterality of ovarian cysts was more in fourport access laparoscopy group (13.7% vs. 32.5%, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital stay, adhesiolysis, transfusion, and insertion of hemo-vac between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group for size matched compare. However additional analgesics were more in four-port access laparoscopy group for unilateral ovarian cystectomy. CONCLUSION: Two-port access laparoscopic surgery was feasible and safe for unilateral and bilateral ovarian cystectomy compare with four-port access laparoscopic surgery.